i took photos of the trees. does not look newly planted, so likely done way before coralresident sent feedback.
just single row of trees, large gaps between crowns of the trees. does not look capable of reducing noise as-is. i checked on "noise abatement research", found the following link,
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/regulations_and_guidance/probresp.cfm which has the following comment on using trees to screen traffic noise; FHWA is "United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration"
Vegetation, which is so high, wide, and dense that it cannot be seen over or through, can decrease highway traffic noise. However, it requires a 200-foot width of such vegetation to reduce noise by 10 decibels, which cuts in half the loudness of traffic noise. It is not feasible to plant enough vegetation along a road to achieve such reductions. If vegetation already exists, it can be saved to maintain a psychological relief, if not an actual lessening of traffic noise levels. If vegetation does not exist, it can be planted for psychological relief, not to reduce traffic noise levels.. . .
Barriers do have limitations. For a noise barrier to work, it must be high enough and long enough to block the view of a road. Noise barriers do very little good for homes on a hillside overlooking a road or for buildings, which rise above the barrier. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/noise_barriers/design_construction/keepdown.cfmVegetation, if it is high enough, wide enough, and dense enough that it cannot be seen over or through, can decrease highway traffic noise. A wide strip of trees with very thick undergrowth can lower noise levels. 30 meters of dense vegetation can reduce noise by five decibels. However, it is not feasible to plant enough trees and other vegetation along a highway to achieve such a reduction. Trees and other vegetation can be planted for psychological relief but not to physically lessen noise levels.